OLXA is listed now on the Chinese Exchange OctaEx !

Hello OLXA Family!

While we are busy during the OLXA ICO, our Team has never stopped working!

OLXA has just been listed on the Asian Cryptocurrency Exchange “OctaEx”.

Octal Bit Exchanger or OctaEx is a new Chinese cryptocurrency exchange, quickly gaining popularity through working with crypto and fiat currencies at the same time.

One of the biggest advantages of trading at OctaEx is the low trading fees, when compared to other exchanges. It charges both market makers and takers with a flat fee of 0.15% while the fees of most established cryptocurrency venues are in the range of 0.20-0.25%.

In addition, OctaEx has no deposit fees, may be depositing of fiat currencies would involve some charges. OctaEx works with some of the most popular fiat currencies (USD & CNY). Therefore, this exchange seems very attractive to the beginners and intermediate levels of crypto-investors, as they can directly deposit and withdraw cash.

OLXA is proud of being listed on OctaEx

Feel free to trade OLXA in the available pairs:

OLXA-BTC at https://www.octaex.com/trade/index/market/olxa_btc/

OLXA-ETH at https://www.octaex.com/trade/index/market/olxa_eth

OLXA-USD at https://www.octaex.com/trade/index/market/olxa_usd

 

We promised to start listing OLXA on many exchanges step by step “Even During the ICO” and we have more incredible news to share with you by the end of this month!

 

OLXA is starting the manufacturing process of its technology products once achieving the softcap of the OLXA Initial Coin Offering ICO, Feel free to Participate Today.

 

With OLXA – The Sky is the Limit!

 

OLXA is proud of having more partners and we welcome all partnership requests through our e-mail at partners@olxacoin.com

 

  OLXA reveals a clear desire to embrace the cryptocurrency market with stability and credibility as a fundamental element of its growth and user focus strategies.

 

Thank you for being one of our global supporters, 

  Keep tuned for more news
  OLXA Team

Leave a Reply: